More revealing facts, evidences and testimonies have continued to trail the on-going hearing sessions on the petition filed by Senator Godswill Akpabio, seeking for nullification of the declaration by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of Dr. Christopher Ekpenyong, as the Senator elect.

National Assembly Elections Petition Tribunal sitting in Uyo, on Friday admitted more witnesses to give testimonies on the National Assembly election conducted in Ikot Ekpene Senatorial District on February 23, 2019.

“Wonders they say shall never end”, this has been the expressions of witnesses at the on-going National Assembly Elections Petition tribunal.

Since the trial began, witnesses have consistently informed the tribunal that INEC surprised them with shocking news of cancellation on already collated results compiled from their Units and Wards and also alleged that INEC has reproduced new voters’ register, which they said were not used on election day.

Seven witnesses that testified on Senator Akpabio’s petition told the three-man panel of the tribunal that they were so amazed to hear that collated election results obtained from their units and wards were cancelled by INEC after they were announced at their respective polling units and wards.

They added that the petitioner, Senator Godswill Akpabio, won convincingly from all the units and wards that results were collated and announced.

According to the Ward Agent in Okon, Ward 8, Essien Udim Local Government Area, he was shocked to hear that the results he signed at his ward collation centre were cancelled by INEC in Uyo, and insisted that he only heard about the cancellation in the court room.

See also  What are the forces controlling Mike Igini?

Responding, the lead counsel to the third respondent (INEC), Mr. Ifeoluwa Ojediran, Esq. said that the reason why INEC cancelled election results in 17 out of 20 pulling units in Okon Ward 8 was because voters’ register used for accreditation were not ticked, and that INEC believed that there was no accreditation of voters.

“My Lord, it is not true. There was accreditation and our names were ticked in my Ward before we were allowed to cast our votes and the same thing was done in other polling units which our Party agents informed me about. There was no cancellation in my presence. I was a Ward Collation Officer for my Party”, the  Witness replied Ojediran.

Testifying on INEC form EC8B1 for Code 06 (Odoro Ikot Ward 6) of 05 registration area, a Witness told the tribunal that he was suprised to hear for the first time inside the tribunal that results in the entire 10 polling units in his Ward were cancelled by INEC in Uyo. He further testified that voters register presented to him in the tribunal was far different from the one INEC brought to the area on election day.

“My Lord, these documents tendered here are different from the one INEC gave to us in all the polling units in Ward 8 in Odoro Ikot, Essien Udim Local Government Area on election day.

“It is a surprise that INEC gave us photocopied documents. I am surprised that there were original documents. Our names were ticked on the voters’ register they gave to us but this one brought here to the tribunal as evidence by INEC; it is shocking that our names on the box are not ticked”. Witness testified.

See also  9th NASS: Buhari takes over lobby for Lawan, Gbajabiamila

The same sad scenario was also was said to have been experienced  in Ukana West Ward 10 and Ukana East Ward 9, both agents discovered at the tribunal that all collated results in 7 and 10 polling units in the two Wards were cancelled by INEC without their knowledge.

They also lamented that Certified True copy of voters register presented at the tribunal by INEC; their passport and accreditation marked tick on the register at the polling units were not found on the register .

The witnesses also disclosed that voters’ register that were used for accreditation on election day were rough, and according to them, was as a result that ad-hoc staff were opening them consistently for accreditation of voters but they were surprised that what was presented by INEC were new documents.

More revelations are expected as the Petitioner calls more witnesses.

The lead counsel to the Petitioner, Mr. S. I. Ameh, SAN was granted June 19 and 20 by the Tribunal to present all his witnesses to continue their testimonies.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.